Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Yelp Inc. v. Paxton
as 24-581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YELP INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Yelp Inc. v. Reviewvio Inc.
as 3:2023cv06508
Plaintiff:
Yelp Inc.
Defendant:
Reviewvio Inc. doing business as Dandy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Yelp, Inc. v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv06417
Plaintiff:
Yelp, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Moreno, Moreno Roofing Company, Inc. and Moreno Roofing Company, Inc. a California Stock Corporation doing business as Moreno Roofing and Solar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Yelp Inc. v. Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
as 3:2023cv04977
Plaintiff:
Yelp Inc.
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreno v. Yelp Inc.
as 3:2023cv04885
Petitioner:
Paul Moreno
Respondent:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Moreno v. Yelp Inc.
as 3:2023cv04569
Plaintiff:
Paul Moreno
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Zia Shaikh v. Laura Germadnig, et al
as 23-2464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZIA SHAIKH
Defendant / Appellant:
SLAVA KLEYMAN and NANCY CAVANAUGH
Defendant:
COWAN GUNTESKI & CO, JOSEPH GUNTESKI, SIEGFRIED GERMADNIG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN A. ZABARSKY, JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT, CHRISTOPHER PARISE, Jackson Township Police Officer and others
Zia Shaikh v. Laura Germadnig, et al
as 23-2301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZIA SHAIKH
Defendant:
SIEGFRIED GERMADNIG, SIEGFRIED GERMADNIG, JR., JD, BARUS GERMADNIG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SLAVA KLEYMAN, NANCY CAVANAUGH, JANICE ELWELL and others
Jonathan Sapan v. Yelp Inc.
as 21-80119
Petitioner:
JONATHAN SAPAN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
YELP INC., a Delaware Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
