Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Sutton v. Cleckley et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
laterrence sutton
Defendant:
Eric Cleckley and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peak v. Yellow Corporation
as 2:2022cv02278
Counter Claimant:
Yellow Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jack Peak
Defendant:
YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Aishah Randall v. YRC Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Randall Aisha and Aishah Randall
Defendant:
YRC Inc. dba YRC Freight, YRC Worldwide Inc., Yellow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc. et al
as 2:2022at00123
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
USF Reddaway, Inc., YRC Worldwide, Inc. and Yellow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
USF Reddaway, Inc., YRC Worldwide, Inc. and Yellow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peak v. Yellow Corporation
as 1:2021cv02367
Plaintiff:
Jack Peak
Defendant:
Yellow Corporation and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02270
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
USF Reddaway, Inc., YRC Worldwide, Inc. and YELLOW CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at01164
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
USF Reddaway, Inc. and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Ronderos v. USF Reddaway, Inc., et al
as 21-55685
Defendant / Appellant:
YELLOW CORPORATION, FKA YRC Worldwide, Inc. and USF REDDAWAY, INC., an Oregon Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE EMILIO RONDEROS, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.