Cases 1 - 10 of 2,358
Keritsis v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05408
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE YOUNG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05125
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05170
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Plaintiff:
SELMA YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NAJJAR v. SALAMEH et al
as 1:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
KARIM P NAJJAR
Defendant:
RIAD SALAMEH, BANQUE DU LIBAN, BANK OF BEIRUT, S.A.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
YOUNG et al v. MONMOUTH COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv04975
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY YOUNG, KIMBERLY YOUNG, as Guardian of their minor child, A.E and A.E. individually
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CATENA et al v. LEE et al
as 2:2024cv04889
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CATENA and LAWRENCE CATENA
Defendant:
JOO YOUNG M LEE, MD, GAIL QUACKENBUSH, MD and MONTCLAIR BREAST CENTER, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
