Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Todd v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2017cv01187
Plaintiff:
Barry D Todd
Defendant:
Yuma, City of, Esmundo Tejeda and Ronald Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tekelu v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2016cv03650
Plaintiff:
Addis Tekelu
Defendant:
Yuma, City of, Rodrigo Bacaneri, Yuma, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pixley v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2016cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pixley
Defendant:
Yuma, City of , Michael Dean , Joseph Van Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Esquivel v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gavino Esquivel
Defendant:
Yuma, City of and Joseph Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chelius et al v. Small et al
as 2:2013cv02543
Defendant:
Rogene D Small, Jr. , Yuma, City of , Richard Thomas Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Gordon Chelius, III , Melinda Tavarez and Brandon Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aker v. Yuma County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2013cv02683
Plaintiff:
Alice L. Aker
Defendant:
Yuma County Sheriffs Department, Yuma City Police Department, Five unkown city of Yuma Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler, City of, et al v. Bank One NA, et al
as 1:2012cv05805
Defendant:
Kuld Corporation and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Plaintiff:
Chandler, City of, Aguila Irrigation District, Apache, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Retention Mastery Systems, Inc. v. Yuma, City of
as 2:2009cv02102
Plaintiff:
Retention Mastery Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Yuma, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Avenue 6E Investments, LLC et al v. Yuma, City of
as 2:2009cv01675
Plaintiff:
Avenue 6E Investments, LLC and Saguaro Desert Land, Inc
Defendant:
Yuma, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
