Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Warren v. McKinney et al
as 4:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Juanette Yvonne Warren
Defendant:
Officer McKinney and Owensboro Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Owensboro Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Detective McKinney and Owensboro Police Department
Plaintiff:
Juanette Yvonne Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Nagel, et al v. Ivan Nagel, et al
as 18-11533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS NAGEL and MATTHEW NAGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
IVAN NAGEL, ALISON NAGEL, ANNA NAGEL and others
Marcus Nagel, et al v. Ivan Nagel, et al
as 18-11533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS NAGEL and MATTHEW NAGEL
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN NAGEL, ALISON NAGEL, ANNA NAGEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
