Cases 1 - 10 of 27
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29221
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26783
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armendariz et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Fernando Armendariz, Miriam Trebino, Matthew Breedon and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21589
Plaintiff:
BROWN ZACHARY and ZACHARY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shai Alkebu-Lan v. Zachary Brown et al
as 4:2021cv06249
Plaintiff:
Shai Alkebu-Lan
Defendant:
Zachary Brown, C. Bravo, C/O M. Daguio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkebu-Lan v. Hazelwood et al
as 4:2021cv06063
Plaintiff:
Shai Bernardo Alkebu-Lan
Defendant:
Lisa Hazelwood, Emily Wizneski, Zachary Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41862
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shai Alkebu-Lan v. Zachary Brown et al
as 2:2021cv06044
Plaintiff:
Shai Alkebu-Lan
Defendant:
Zachary Brown, C. Bravo, M. Daguio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Raglin et al
as 3:2021cv01218
Defendant:
Zachary Brown and Michelle Raglin
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Perry, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
