Cases 91 - 100 of 133
Doss v. Northcutt et al
as 4:2012cv02718
Plaintiff:
Sandrew Doss
Defendant:
William Northcutt, Wheat, R Ragan and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. Peters et al
as 4:2012cv02538
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
Kenneth N Peters, Carter F Davenport, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Jackson et al
as 7:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Otis Thompson
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Missy Homan-Hibbett, John H Wilkerson, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McBee v. Warden Buttler et al
as 6:2012cv02475
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Warden Buttler, Captain Holcome, J Pearce and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinear v. Taylor Hardin S.M.F. et al
as 7:2012cv02411
Plaintiff:
Keith Martinear
Defendant:
Taylor Hardin S.M.F. and Jane Doe
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Gomez et al
as 5:2012cv02256
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter Mays
Defendant:
Ernest Gomez, Chuck Phillips and Betsy Gentles
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Correctional Medical Services Inc
as 2:2012cv02103
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Mendheim et al
as 2:2012cv02096
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr
Defendant:
Brady Eutaw Mendheim and Mary B Windom
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskin v. Roy, et al.
as 4:2012cv02067
Plaintiff:
Torreco Hoskin
Defendant:
Kennedy Roy, McDonald and Bolling
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. FPC Montgomery et al
as 2:2012cv02061
Plaintiff:
Detrine Hudson
Defendant:
FPC Montgomery and Moye
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
