Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 7:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bently and Willie Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bennett et al
as 7:2016cv01421
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Debra Toney and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Marcus D McQueen
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Birmingham Police Department, B C Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Derrick Moss
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Butler et al
as 6:2014cv00777
Plaintiff:
David K Dotson
Defendant:
Freddie Butler and Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Bankston et al
as 4:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Dewayne Bankston and Matt Cooper
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Cornelison et al
as 4:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll, JR
Defendant:
Billy J Cornelison and John A Mason
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddins v. State of Alabama
as 2:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Eddins
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Ingle et al
as 5:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stacy Allen Sparks
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, Chris Whitley and Fayette County Commission
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
