Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Vandergrift v. Hutton et al

as 7:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eddie Vandergrift
Defendant:
John Hutton, Willie Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Robertson
as 5:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Edward Lavar King
Defendant:
Kenneth E Robertson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Birmingham City Jail

as 2:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shawn Davis
Defendant:
Birmingham City Jail, Harper, Shelby and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fikes v. Roseman et al
as 7:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Raheem Mataro Fikes
Defendant:
Roseman, Hutton and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Thomas et al

as 7:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Carl Adonis Powell, Jr
Defendant:
Terry Thomas, John Hutton and Willie Bennett
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Entrekin et al

as 4:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Corion Leshon Moore
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, N Exford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Specks et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Cedric Specks, Corizon Medical Services, Officer Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherenfant v. Harkins
as 1:2016cv02073
Plaintiff:
Rony Cherenfant
Defendant:
Officer Harkins
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Huffman et al
as 2:2016cv02033
Plaintiff:
William R. Best, Jr.
Defendant:
Harris Huffman and David Brown
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abercrombie v. Head

as 2:2016cv02009
Plaintiff:
Mesiah Abercrombie
Defendant:
Jennifer Head
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.