Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Coker v. Gordy et al
as 4:2018cv00767
Petitioner:
Larry Gwen Coker
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Walker County Sheriff
as 6:2018cv00718
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Walker
Respondent:
Walker County Sheriff
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Southwick v. Bolling
as 5:2018cv00719
Petitioner:
Joshua Loyd Southwick
Respondent:
Leon Bolling
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yeager v. Robinson et al
as 5:2018cv00645
Plaintiff:
Robert Yeager
Defendant:
Robinson, Warden Gordy, Limestone Correctional Facility and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00633
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Papineau v. Gordy et al
as 2:2018cv00622
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Papineau
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 4:2018cv00619
Petitioner:
Vaughn Johnson
Respondent:
ICE, DOS, DOJ and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nye v. State of Alabama
as 5:2018cv00554
Petitioner:
James Donald Nye
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fletcher v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jovorr Aswon Fletcher
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Errol Pickens and Jefrey Baldwin
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00527
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
