Cases filed in Minnesota matching ""AT&T Mobility""
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,558
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff: Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Peralta v. T-Mobile
as 4:2024cv02229
Plaintiff: Lizbeth Peralta
Defendant: T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff: Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff: Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emmanuel Agbara v. Evelyn Okoji
as 24-7046
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Agbara
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC, Evelyn Onyenyi Okoji, Nigerian Catholic Community at St. Jerome Catholic Church and others
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff: Bloosurf, LLC
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. and TDI ACQUISITION SUB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff: Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Naemi v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02041
Plaintiff: Naema Naemi
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Morvarid Emamy v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00734
Plaintiff: Morvarid Emamy
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?