Cases 1 - 10 of 5,623
Schwartz et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02213
Plaintiff:
Zachary Schwartz and Bernadette Lionetta
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Arakji v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Mazen Arakji
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Amazon, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kane v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnston Kane
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Herrerias et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02199
Plaintiff:
Anali Herrerias and Mariah Nayeri
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1675
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and APPLE INC.
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1676
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and APPLE INC.
Leonard v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
as 1:2024ml00773
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Grubmarket Inc. v. James Corrado, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02652
Plaintiff:
Grubmarket Inc. doing business as Leo's Apples
Defendant:
James Corrado, Inc. doing business as Corrado's Market, Peter Corrado, Joseph Corrado and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
