Cases 21 - 30 of 5,639
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1676
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and APPLE INC.
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Leonard v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
as 1:2024ml00773
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Grubmarket Inc. v. James Corrado, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02652
Plaintiff:
Grubmarket Inc. doing business as Leo's Apples
Defendant:
James Corrado, Inc. doing business as Corrado's Market, Peter Corrado, Joseph Corrado and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
v. Proxima Beta Pte. Limited
as 3:2024mc80085
Not Yet Classified:
Proxima Beta Pte. Limited, Apple, Inc. and Google LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOODY et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MOODY, ALFREDO DE LA HOZ and ENRIQUE FINKELSTEIN
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SIANO et al v. APPLE, INC
as 2:2024cv04568
Plaintiff:
DEANNA SIANO and CHRISTOPHER WALKER
Defendant:
APPLE, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
