Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Morgan et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Paul Morgan , Cliff Deese and Joseph Balthozor
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders et al v. Flaherty et al
as 3:2013cv00854
Plaintiff:
Michael J. G. Saunders and William S. MacDonald
Defendant:
W. Steven Flaherty and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as MN/0:13-cv-03174
Plaintiff:
Paul Morgan , Cliff Deese and Joseph Balthozor
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Morgan et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 0:2013cv03174
Plaintiff:
Paul Morgan , Cliff Deese and Joseph Balthozor
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Churchill v. Woolums
as 3:2013cv00529
Plaintiff:
Brandon Churchill
Defendant:
Everett Woolums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Turner v. Mitchell
as 3:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Larry Turner
Defendant:
Kenny D. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Schwabe v. Mickey et al
as 3:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Schwabe
Defendant:
William Mickey and Carolyn Mickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wood v. Costan
as 3:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
Charles Wood
Defendant:
Alton Costan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Mary Beasley v. Arron Brown
as 13-1552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY E. BEASLEY, Personal Representative for Estate of Darryl E. Beasley
Defendant - Appellee:
ARRON BROWN, RENEE BROTHERS, ANTHONY ANDERSON and others
Morris v. Regency Finance Company
as 3:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Morgan Morris
Defendant:
Regency Finance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
