Cases 1 - 10 of 535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ingram v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01298
Petitioner:
Herman Ingram
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Supra National Express, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Supra National Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Christopher Wilson, Junior Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENSLEY v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSH HENSLEY, SHAINA LAUGHLIN, CHARLEY CATT and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Robert Adams
as 24-5066
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT THURMAN ADAMS
Adams et al v. Bonneville Power Administration et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Carey Anderson, Karen Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
