Cases 31 - 40 of 823,787
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LUCAS v. SPUSTA et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lucas
Defendant:
Sergeant Joseph S. Spusta and COUNTY OF ERIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Luzerne County DA's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Nelson
Defendant:
Luzerne County DA's Office, Judge(s) and Adult Probation/Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HIll et al v. Lanigan Worldwide Moving and Warehousing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02235
Not Yet Classified:
Joe W. Brown
Plaintiff:
Michael J. HIll and Sheena Reed-Hill
Defendant:
Lanigan Worldwide Moving and Warehousing, Inc. d/b/a Berger Transfer and Storage
Adams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
April Adams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Neisen v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Nueces County, Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeBorde v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01371
Petitioner:
Christopher DeBorde
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
