Cases 101 - 110 of 823,696
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Cox Communications Hampton Roads LLC
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Cox Communications Hampton Roads LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cunningham et al v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Arnette Cunningham and Madelyn Ruth Cunningham
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hartley v. JM Dental LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Mary Hartley
Defendant:
JM Dental LLC, Weber Dental LLC and Mathias Weber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 3:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Tim Saxon, Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2024at00460
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Sheriff Tim Saxon, Corporal Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation v. Ruby Transport Inc et al
as 8:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation doing business as Vendor Services Center
Defendant:
Ruby Transport Inc, Leila Cantu and Ricardo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PARIOT v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
LATASHA PARIOT
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Fouad Abdulkadir
as 24-3298
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FOUAD SAEED ABDULKADIR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
