Cases filed in Nebraska matching "S"
Cases 101 - 110 of 823,876
Spriggs v. Graham et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: Jason Patrick Spriggs
Defendant: Corey Graham and Lutheran Kosciusko Hospital
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant: CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROTH et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00585
Petitioner: JENNY SCHROTH and JEFFREY ROBERT SCHROTH
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1359
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Starling v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 24-1341
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY STARLING, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: ONPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC
USA v. Damon Carey
as 24-1612
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAMON TODD CAREY
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
BankUnited NA v. William Scism, et al
as 24-1671
Plaintiff: BANKUNITED NA
Defendant: WILLIAM SCISM, KAREN SCISM and GC OF VINELAND LLC
Defendant / Appellee: GOLDEN CORRAL CORP and GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEMS INC
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner: ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Berkeley County School District v. HUB International Limited
as 24-1328
Plaintiff: BERKELEY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant: HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, HUB INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST LIMITED, HUB INTERNATIONAL SOUTHEAST and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?