Cases 121 - 130 of 824,328
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Shenzhen Yibo Technology v. FDA
as 24-60191
Petitioner:
Shenzhen Yibo Technology Company, Limited
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
United States v. Edward Martin
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Martin
Estate of Amanda Bews, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2458
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AMANDA BEWS, by and through its successors-in-interest A.S.R., by and through her guardian Melinda Bettencourt, MELINDA BETTENCOURT, individually, R.E.H., by and through his guardian Robert Hamby and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SEAN OBRIEN HENDERSON, MD, in his individual capacity, ALEX VILLANUEVA, in his official capacity and others
Spencer v. Jasso, et al.
as 24-2443
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. SPENCER
Defendant:
J. JASSO and S. HILLMAN, Mail Room Supervisor
Reyes-Torres v. Garland
as 24-2472
Petitioner:
JOSE RAMON REYES-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Waked, et al v. Kerr, et al
as 24-2064
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JEREMY WAKED and THERESA IRENE STONE
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ALEXANDRIA KERR, TIMOTHY JAMES RIVERA and JANE TERRY
American Chemistry Council, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
as 24-11206
Petitioner:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL and GEORGIA CHEMISTRY COUNCIL
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
