Cases 11 - 20 of 823,876
Yourglich v. Pension Benefit Information LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv11004
Plaintiff:
Brad Yourglich
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. v Indian Farm Estates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11019
Plaintiff:
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. doing business as Royal Oaks Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Indian Farm Estates, LLC and James Martorilli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Friday et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Tony Friday and Freda S. Friday
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Mooney et al v. Hussmann Corporation
as 4:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
S. Mooney and Panasonic Corporation of North America
Defendant:
Hussmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
King v. Uppal
as 1:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Candace S King
Defendant:
Sukhvinder Uppal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Besso v. Great Lakes Home Remodeling, LLC
as 3:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Adam Besso
Defendant:
Great Lakes Home Remodeling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Numrich v. Sewell et al
as 5:2024cv00395
Defendant:
GEICO Secure Insurance Company, Billy Gene Sewell and GEICO
Plaintiff:
Eric Numrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MCDERMOTT v. GAIA ENTERPRISES INC
as 2:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
GAIA ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
