Cases 81 - 90 of 824,328
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.
as 1:2024cv11048
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Joseph
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024cv11028
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Jones
Defendant:
S. Campbell and J. Bush
Alexander #182285 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Allen Alexander #182285
Defendant:
Jeremy Bush, Barbra Storey, Jeffrey Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act - Private Entities Enforcement
Johnson v. Glasgow
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
Stephen Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DREVER ATELIER ANGEL BORROWER, LLC v. S. MCCOY GROUP LLC et al
as 6:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
DREVER ATELIER ANGEL BORROWER, LLC
Defendant:
S. MCCOY GROUP LLC and MIDWEST GC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
George v. Grounds For Termination, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Grounds For Termination, LLC, BV Products, LLC and Daren Donnelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
George v. Grounds For Termination, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Grounds For Termination, LLC, BV Products, LLC and Daren Donnelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
