Cases 31 - 40 of 824,669
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lanier v. Barlow et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lanier
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Barlow, Corporal B. A. Shinaberry, Deputy Kendal Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuggle v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tuggle
Defendant:
Cord Williams, Christian L. Pyles, E Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milestone Aviation Group v. DSV Air & Sea, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Milestone Aviation Group
Defendant:
DSV Air & Sea, Inc. and DSV Ocean Transport A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv21556
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Roseberry #178096 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Homer R Roseberry
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natal v. Target Corporation
as 0:2024cv60684
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Curet Natal
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARMON v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2024cv05579
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARMON
Defendant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, JR. and ST. PAUL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
