Cases 1 - 10 of 372
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 24-539
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP V. USA
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 23-7878
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10150
Plaintiff:
Ashu Shukla
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP and Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Deloitte LLP Group Insurance PLan
as 1:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP Group Insurance PLan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Tanya Dancekelly et al v. Deloitte LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04101
Plaintiff:
Tanya Dancekelly, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association and Minimally Invasive Surgical Association
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
