Cases 101 - 110 of 7,678
CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLOUDOFCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
NCR CORPORATION
Yates v. University of Mississippi Medical Center- Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Yates
Defendant:
University of Mississippi Medical Center- Jackson, Chief Mary Paradis, Chief Deputy Joshua Bromen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bledsoe v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Doris Bledsoe
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Yates Jr v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Yates Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
YATES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22855
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARK YATES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wharf Retail Properties, LLC v. Landmark American Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Wharf Retail Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Landmark American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. BECERRA
as 2:2022cv03932
Plaintiff:
GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Serna v. BBVA USA
as 1:2022cv00852
Defendant:
BBVA USA, BBVA Compass Bank and PNC Bank
Plaintiff:
Mike Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wills v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Terrance Wills
Defendant:
Yates and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
