Cases 41 - 50 of 8,006
Weingrad v. 22nd Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv10202
Plaintiff:
Peri Weingrad
Defendant:
22nd Judicial Circuit Court, Washtenaw Probate Court, Julia B. Owdziej and others
Hughes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hughes
Defendant:
Wells Fargo bank, N.A.
Other:
Stacy Estes Yates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
US, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
BOEING CO., UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Mark Yates, et al
as 24-10248
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
MARK YATES and WALL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
OFFICER YATES and OFFICER HARGRAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. William Hooper, Jr.
as 24-6036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON HOOPER, JR.
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska
Defendant:
Department of the Army, HON Christine E Wormuth, Department of the Army, Office of Army Cemeteries and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Sheffield v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, Warden DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 24-195
Petitioner:
DIANA YATES
Respondent:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
United States of America v. Yates
as 24-176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DARNEKO YATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
