Torts - Injury Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California matching "yates"
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,678
Smith v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: John Smith
Defendant: John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff: Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant: Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00005
Plaintiff: Cassandra Yates
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Warren et al v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv02200
Plaintiff: Diamond Warren and Robert Yates
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Yates, et al
as 22-3672
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: John P. Yates, Warden, Blair, Camp Unit Manager, Randle and others
Yates v. Pullman Point Apartments et al
as 3:2022cv09185
Plaintiff: Moneka Yates
Defendant: Pullman Point Apartments, John Stewart Companies, Sysouk Manivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zetzer v. Crown Battery Manufacturing Company
as 3:2022cv02329
Plaintiff: Tiffany Zetzer
Defendant: Crown Battery Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
David Mero v. Yates
as 22-3649
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Mero
Defendant / Appellee: Yates, Warden
Government Leasing, LLC v. Transource Services Corp.
as 1:2022cv03325
Plaintiff: Government Leasing, LLC
Defendant: Transource Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?