Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 77
USA v. 1976 Sabreliner Business Jet
as 17-5539
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1976 SABRELINER BUSINESS JET AND LOG BOOKS, et al.
Interested Party - Appellant: KENNETH D. GARNER, SHARON GARNER
USA v. $12,410.00 in U.S. Currency
as 09-4291
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $12,410.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Third Party - Appellant: TOMMY W. RICE
USA v. $7,348 in U.S. Currency, et al
as 09-3052
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $7,348 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Defendant - Appellant: BUTCH RAY DIXON
USA v. Contents of Smith Barney Citig, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3466
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CONTENTS OF SMITH BARNEY CITIGROUP ACCOUNT NO 34-19, et al.
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DOYLE
USA v. Certain payments Flats East De, et al
as 12-4534
Movant - Appellant: CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FUND LTD., INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL CENTER, LLC
Defendant: CERTAIN PAYMENTS FLATS EAST DEVELOPMENT, LLC (FLATS EAST) IS OBLIGATED TO MAKE TO THE CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FUND, LTD. (CIF) PURSUANT TO AN AMENDED CREDIT AGREEMENT, MONTHLY (INTEREST) PAYMENTS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. (UH) IS OBLIGATED TO MAKE TO THE CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FUND, LTD. (CIF) ON CERTAIN PROMISSORY NOTES FOR TERMS NOT TO EXCEED 60 MO, MONTHLY PAYMENTS THE INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL CENTER, LLC (IRC), IS OBLIGATED TO MAKE TO THE CLEVELAND GROUP, LTD., UNDER A PROMISSORY NOTE DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2012
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Contents of Accounts, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5799
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CONTENTS OF ACCOUNTS, et al.
Appellant: ISRAEL CHAVEZ, CHAVEZ, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?