Cases 21 - 30 of 31,907
Gray v. Pace Academy et al
as 2:2024cv10971
Plaintiff:
GRITIANA GRAY
Defendant:
PACE ACADEMY, JOSEPH POLLACK, ACADEMIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. PSP Franchising, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10962
Plaintiff:
Gloriel Howard
Defendant:
PSP Franchising, LLC, PSP Stores, LLC, PJJD, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Ferriss v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ferriss
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Milanczuk v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Joanne Milanczuk
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Kirstyn Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
as 24-3292
Plaintiff:
KIRSTYN PAIGE BASHAW
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE OF WHITEHALL, LLC
Ferguson v. BlendedTraditions Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Ferguson
Defendant:
BlendedTraditions Inc. and Tasha N. Harris
Balderas v. Norplas Industries, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Angelica Balderas
Defendant:
Norplas Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
