Cases 1 - 10 of 2,218
Shenzhen Mengdan Technology Co v. RVLock & Co
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Mengdan Technology Co
Defendant:
RVLock & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Axcess Global Sciences v. Shopping EZ et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Axcess Global Sciences
Defendant:
Shopping EZ LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company doing business as Health and Wellness Plus doing business as Tygaz and Erica Fresh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
HuxWrx Safety Co v. SilencerCo
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
HuxWrk Safety Co and HuxWrx Safety Co
Defendant:
SilencerCo
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
RSB Spine v. Innovasis
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
RSB Spine
Defendant:
Innovasis
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Cornwell Quality Tools v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cornwell Quality Tools
Defendant:
Shane Woods, Marylou Woods, Woods Family Tools and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tamara Wareka v. Twist Me Pretty
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Twist Me Pretty
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Tamara Wareka v. Twist Me Pretty
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Twist Me Pretty
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
iFit v. Macrofit
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
iFit
Defendant:
Macrofit
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
J&I Maintenance INC v. J&I Maintenance, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
J&I Maintenance INC
Defendant:
J&I Maintenance, LLC, Jerry Rodriguez and Ana Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
Xidrone Systems v. Fortem Technologies
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Xidrone Systems
Defendant:
Fortem Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
