Cases 21 - 30 of 331,910
Toussaint v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02953
Plaintiff:
Theodore S. Toussaint
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Capano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02961
Plaintiff:
Michael Capano
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Samuel v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02989
Plaintiff:
Quasia Samuel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bergholm v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02994
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Bergholm
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lupo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02993
Plaintiff:
Elaine Nichole Lupo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dowell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Michael Dowell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blizard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blizard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Bishop
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wion v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karley Ann Wion
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
TRAYVONE TYRELL BOYD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
