Cases 1 - 10 of 974
Valverde v. Postal Service (U.S.) et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Paul Valverde
Defendant:
Postal Service (U.S.) and Alan Castellanoz
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
B.A. v. Robertson, et al.
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Minor Child Brayden Albertson and United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Kathy Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gates v. Motis Brands, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Dakota Gates
Defendant:
Forecome Ecommerce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Robertson v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kathy Robertson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dallimore v. Idaho National Laboratory
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jason Dallimore
Defendant:
Idaho National Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Qualman v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Treg Qualman
Defendant:
Jodi L. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Klimenko v. Glanbia Foods Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
SERGEY KLIMENKO
Defendant:
GLANBIA FOODS INC and LUIS F RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burch v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al.
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Burch
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. McAllister
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Austin Chance Evans
Defendant:
Megann Nicole McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Race
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Ben Edward Race
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
