Cases 11 - 20 of 54
AHMED v. MOHAMMED
as 1:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
SAED W. MARAWE AHMED
Defendant:
ELNUR H. MOHAMMED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
NOLAN v. SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, P.A. et al
as 1:2016cv01792
Plaintiff:
VICKI R. NOLAN
Defendant:
SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, P.A., HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA), FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
BANK OF AMERICA v. CLARKE
as 1:2016cv01525
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES E. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RAJA et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
M. NAWAZ RAJA and NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, INDY MAC BANK FSB, INDY MAC FEDERAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
KING et al v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
as 1:2015cv02061
Plaintiff:
LAZINA KING and RIA KING
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILLIAMS et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
CELIA M. WILLIAMS and MARIAN A. LASHER
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ALBERTELLI LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROLAND v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
BERNARD ROLAND
Defendant:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CORPORATION and SAMUEL I. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
ROSEBY v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
as 1:2013cv01284
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ROSEBY
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
1363 PEABODY STREET COOPERATIVE, INC. v. SAKHO et al
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
1363 PEABODY STREET COOPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
IBRAHIM SAKHO, MI CASA, INC., KEYSTAR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
EMERSON v. SETERUS, INC.
as 1:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
LEONIDAS EMERSON
Defendant:
SETERUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
