Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Wilkerson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
as 3:2015cv02657
Plaintiff:
Hubert Wayne Wilkerson
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Bravo Soltero v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2015cv02559
Plaintiff:
Hector Eduardo Bravo Soltero
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Spencer v. Headquarters CA Lottery
as 3:2015cv01470
Plaintiff:
Alonzo I Spencer
Defendant:
Headquarters CA Lottery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orlando v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2015cv01089
Plaintiff:
Robert Orlando
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. , Whirlpool Corporation and Does 1 through 30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCue v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2015cv01059
Plaintiff:
Garry L. McCue
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Forthun v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
Gerome Forthun
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and DOES 1-30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
San Diego Gas & Electric Company et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00605
Plaintiff:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company and Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. DG 103412
Defendant:
ABB, Inc. , ABB Power T&D Company and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meritplan Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Meritplan Insurance Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mid-Century Insurance Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. A.O. Smith Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02756
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corp. and DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
