Cases 61 - 70 of 214
Umina v. MacKenzie et al
as 9:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Lucas Lumina, Does 1-50 and Roderick L. MacKenzie
Plaintiff:
Leonard Umina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. v. Consolidated Divisions, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00055
Defendant:
Consolidated Divisions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dick Anderson Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bold et al v. Crop Production Services et al
as 4:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Spencer Bold, Alexandra Bold, Robert Bold and others
Defendant:
Crop Production Services, Loveland Products and Nutrien Ag Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BNSF Railway Company v. Wallace et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wallace, Marvin Wallace and Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Healow v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
James P Healow
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , Robert Bosch GMBH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. RJC Investment, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Travis William Allen
Defendant:
RJC Investment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Baity v. United States Postal Service et al
as 9:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Baity
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, The United States Justice Department and The United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Sampson et al v. Rafferty Financial Consulting & Implementation
as 6:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Sampson and James K. Sampson
Defendant:
Rafferty Financial Consulting & Implementation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lussy v. Lussy et al
as 2:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Lussy
Defendant:
Henry Paumie Lussy, Launa Lynn Roque, Juahlee Murie Bornff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Hatzenbeller et al
as 4:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Foster
Defendant:
Kenneth Hatzenbeller and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.