Cases 31 - 40 of 518
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank & The General Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank & The General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
San Enterprises, LLC et al v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 1:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
San Enterprises, LLC and Sophia A. Nelson
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Ivan D. Davis, Richard D. Fairbank and Deena L. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Longeviti, LLC v. MVB Bank, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Longeviti, LLC
Defendant:
MVB Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
OpenMFG LLC v. Wells Fargo, N.A., et al.
as 2:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
OpenMFG LLC doing business as Xtuple
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, N.A., John Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Violation Virginia Consumer Protection Act
Pearson v. TD Ameritrade
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Adam K. Pearson
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
OPEN MFG LLC, d/b/a XTUPLE v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
OPEN MFG LLC, d/b/a XTUPLE
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, N.A., John Doe 1 and JANE DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Violation Virginia Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
