Cases 1 - 10 of 1,716
United States of America v. Palmetto State Armory Rock Pistol et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Palmetto State Armory Rock Pistol, SCCY CPX-2 Pistol, Two Taurus G3C Pistols and others
United States of America v. $1,418,519 in U.S. Currency, $2,000 in U.S. Currency, $792 in U.S. Currency, and $1,891 in U.S. Currency
as 8:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,418,519 in U.S. Currency, $2,000 in U.S. Currency, $792 in U.S. Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Sandoval Roca v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Nestor Vladamir Sandoval Roca
Defendant:
United States of America
United States of America v. $11,123.00 from Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,123.00 From Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
United States of America v. 0.17366943 BITCOIN
as 3:2024cv00988
Defendant:
0.17366943 BITCOIN and BTC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $7,770.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $7,770.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Property Forfeiture
United States of America v. $2,767,919.94 in Proceeds
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$2,767,919.94 in Proceeds
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $33,720 in United States Currency
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $33,720 in United States Currency
United States of America v. Approximately $42,181 in United States Currency
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $42,181 in United States Currency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
