Other Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 209
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEBRICK
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RICKY DON DEBRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIX HUNDRED ONE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX DOLLARS AND NINETEEN CENTS ($601,426.19) OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $601,426.19 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $4,866,527.84 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $160,810.94 ASSOCIATED WITH BINRIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00529
Not Yet Classified: $601,426.19 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED
Defendant: $4,866,527.84 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $160,810.94 ASSOCIATED WITH BINRIN LIMITED, $1,078,587.67 ASSOCIATED WITH SIBSHUR LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
NASIEF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2023mc00124
Plaintiff: MOHAMMAD NASIEF
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $682,920 OF FUNDS HELD IN THE NAME OF FINROST LIMITED
as 1:2023cv03560
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $682,920 OF FUNDS HELD IN THE NAME OF FINROST LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03359
Plaintiff: MOHAMMAD NASIEF
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 80020796, IN THE NAME OF DORAVILLE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, AT DEUTSCHE BANK INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED IN JERSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS OR ASSETS TR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01832
Claimant: ZAINAB SHINKAFI BAGUDU, IBRAHIM BAGUDU, GODSON M. NNAKA and others
Defendant: ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 223406510PUSD, IN THE NAME OF STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AT BANQUE SBA, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS, OR ASSETS TRACEABLE THERETO, STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION, TOGETHER WITH ITS ASSETS AND ALL PROPERTY TRACEABLE THERTO, ALL ASSETS HELD IN THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OF BLUE HOLDING (2) PTE. LTD., ON BEHALF OF OR TRACEABLE TO RIDLEY GROUP LIMITED, AND/OR THE RIDLEY TRUST AT J.O. HAMBRO INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND A and others
Interested Party: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA and NNSKS & ASSOCIATES
Petitioner: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA and EMMANUEL OGEBE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $402,669.95 SEIZED FROM ONE SANDY SPRING BANK ACCOUNT
as 1:2023cv02527
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $402,669.95 SEIZED FROM ONE SANDY SPRING BANK ACCOUNT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES; 35 AKS-74U ASSAULT RIFLES; 298 AKS20U CARBINE RIFLES; 19 TYPE 80 GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINE GUNS; 265 PKM-PATTERN GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINE GUNS; et al, 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES, 35 AKS-74U ASSAULT RIFLES; 298 AKS20U CARBINE RIFLES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.063 MILLION ROUNDS OF 7.62X54MM AMMUNITION
as 1:2023cv00880
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1.063 MILLION ROUNDS OF 7.62X54MM AMMUNITION; 24,000 ROUNDS OF 12.7MMX99MM AMMUNITION; 6,960 PROXIMITY FUSES FOR ROCKET-PROPELLED GRENADES; AND 2,000 KG OF PROPELLANT FOR ROCKET-PROPELLED GRENADES, 1.063 MILLION ROUNDS OF 7.62X54MM AMMUNITION, 24,000 ROUNDS OF 12.7MMX99MM AMMUNITION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?