Cases 101 - 110 of 8,628
Wade et al v. Greenville Police Department
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Eric Wade and Yvette Toy
Defendant:
Greenville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Peters and Patrick Peters
Defendant:
Seth Fuller, Derek Harris, Colby Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Penton v. City of Pearl, Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Keith Penton
Defendant:
City of Pearl, Mississippi and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. MS State IRS et al
as 3:2023cv03176
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
MS State IRS and DOJ etc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
