Cases 111 - 120 of 26,245
SCARBOROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCARBOROUGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ALEXANDER v. OMALLEY
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
BARRY LUNOAH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MARTIN J OMALLEY and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (INTERESTED PARTY)
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPEARS
as 5:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
THOMAS SPEARS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
SMITH v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
EVERETT SMITH
Respondent:
GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION v. MERCER
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION
Defendant:
BARRY MERCER
Petitioner:
CLAYTON MANUFACTURED HOMES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COOK v. PERRY
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
WARDEN J KEVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
