Cases 111 - 120 of 9,835
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Bottino v. Howard County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dianne Bottino
Defendant:
Howard County, Maryland, Warden/Director Margaret M. Chippendale, Warden/Director Jama Acuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Violation of Constitutional Rights
Washington v. Bridgestone Retail Operation
as 8:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
David Carlos Washington
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Sexual Harrassment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Carroll v. AT&T Government Solutions
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
AT&T Solutions Inc., AT&T Government Solutions and Aaron Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Banerjee v. Branigan et al
as 8:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy Branigan, Judge Peter Jo Messitte, Judge Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
