Cases 111 - 120 of 921
Rojas v. Pettey et al
as 2:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Carlos Razo Rojas
Defendant:
Jax H. Pettey and Pettey & Associates Law Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olsen et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Nathan Olsen and Melinda Olsen
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Halliday Watkins and Mann PC , Paul M. Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Carrington Mortgage Services v. Gomez et al
as 2:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carrington Mortgage Services
Defendant:
Debra Gomez, Kaylynn Gygi, Michael Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ershigs Inc v. MIR Industrial et al
as 2:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ershigs Inc
Defendant:
MIR Industrial and Holcim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garlett Construction v. Leonard et al
as 2:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Garlett Construction
Defendant:
Curtis Leonard , Genevieve Leonard and Bank of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nevins/Adams-40 v. Plant Performance Services
as 2:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nevins/Adams-40
Defendant:
Plant Performance Services and Jeff Watson
Cross_claimant:
Plant Performance Services
Cross_defendant:
Jeff Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RM Lifestyles v. Kent et al
as 2:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
RM Lifestyles
Defendant:
Christopher Kent and Tobie Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Purdy v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Homer E. Purdy
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, Lundburg & Associates, JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kent v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kent
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US Bank National Association v. Deucher et al
as 2:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Chad R. Deucher , Jessica Deucher , Progressive Credit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
