Cases 141 - 150 of 268
Seeling v. AM-PM Trucking, LLC
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Devon Seeling
Defendant:
AM-PM Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guska v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company
as 4:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Bosko R. Guska
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Korinek et al v. FlexTM, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Kolynda Korinek and Krystal Ihli
Defendant:
FlexTM, Inc. , CDS Financial Services, LLC, John Hancock Retirement Plan Services LLC and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Helena Moravec
3rd_party_plaintiff:
FlexTM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sailer et al v. City of Williston
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sailer , Cameron Bradley , Sharyl Busch and others
Defendant:
City of Williston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kennevick et al v. Deer Valley Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Kennevick , Dean Byington and James Payne
Defendant:
Deer Valley Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gunderson v. Titan Machinery, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Joleen A. Gunderson
Defendant:
Titan Machinery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fenyes et al v. Innovative Industrial Constructors, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Sandor Fenyes , Jay Roberts and Michael Hopper
Defendant:
Innovative Industrial Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lee v. General Equipment & Supplies, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Amber Lynn Lee
Defendant:
General Equipment & Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Paesano v. Hess Boys Water & Oil Field Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Joe Paesano
Defendant:
Hess Boys Water & Oil Field Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McKay v. Tharaldson, et al.
as 3:2008cv00113
Interested Party:
Roy Blassingame
Defendant:
Gary D. Tharaldson and Tharaldson Motels Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Plaintiff:
Bernard McKay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
