Cases 151 - 160 of 16,117
Woodham v. Woodham, et al
as 23-2025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRACE WOODHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET WOODHAM, ROBERT WOODHAM, TREVOR GARNER and others
Cook v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
John Cook
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Long v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv40169
Petitioner:
James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Monte v. Adan
as 3:2023cv01605
Petitioner:
Connor Vicent D'Monte and Conor Vincent D'Monte
Respondent:
Angel L. Adan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wholey v. Bradley, et al
as 23-2076
Petitioner:
JOHN F. WHOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
HONORABLE JUDGE HEATHER BRADLEY, Hingham District Court, JUDGE JAMES BYRNE, Hingham District Court, CLERK MAGISTRATE PAUL FULLAM, Hingham District Court and others
Dasilva v. USA 19cr10120-PBS
as 1:2024cv10202
Petitioner:
Nelsy Dasilva
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Enwonwu v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Francis Obiora Enwonwu
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Wyatt Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mello v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mello
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, J Mansello, Seth Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
