Cases 11 - 20 of 19,569
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
BLANEY et al v. YOUSSEF et al
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY and MAROSE REALTY CORP
Defendant:
DOHA YOUSSEF, VALLEY BANK, ANTHONY BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOCCHINO v. CITY OF WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOCCHINO
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SESSION et al v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SESSION and JEANETTE SESSION
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, IAN BUCS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MITROS v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2024cv04996
Defendant:
JENNIFER H. MCCONNELL, KEVIN T. MCCONNELL, HOLLY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
MITROS v. MITROS et al
as 1:2024cv04995
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
ANTHONY JOHN MITROS, JR., LINDA MARIE MITROS and JENNIQUE CANNOR METZLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
