Cases 11 - 20 of 57
DOE TEST v. WARDEN SCI WAYMART TEST
as 2:2023cv99989
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOE TEST
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI WAYMART TEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2022cv01970
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, JANE DOE and WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frick v. Spiess, et al
as 1:2021cv00959
Defendant:
Charles Rees Brown, Federal Bureau Investigation, Michael Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Frick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CANO v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11870
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
MAGDIEL ALEXANDER MORAD CANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIRHAL v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11734
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
GUILHERME BONTEMPO VIRHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DURMER v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE (RUTGERS) et al
as 2:2020cv00271
Defendant:
MD SUMALATHA MANNAVA, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE (RUTGERS) and N.J. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOEL E. DURMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nall v. Sussex Correctional Institution
as 1:2019cv02191
Defendant:
Sussex Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nall v. Sussex Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2019cv02190
Defendant:
Sussex Correctional Institution, Louise (Hillman) Bounds and James Bounds
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER v. GREEN et al
as 2:2018cv14195
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and CHARLES L GREEN
Plaintiff:
TROY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
