Cases 31 - 40 of 275,751
Karr v. Biden Jr et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Karr, Jr
Defendant:
President Joseph R Biden Jr, United States of America, Department of Veterans Affair and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trezell Heckard v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leura et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Joanna Leura and Glam Studios LLC
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Benton v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Cheresse Benton
Defendant:
Bridgestone Corporation, Bridgestone Americas Inc, Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Henriquez v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jose Mauricio Henriquez
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jingco v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Margarita Jingco
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jingco v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Margarita Jingco
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.