Cases 31 - 40 of 100,780
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mills v. Bank OZK
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jonnie Joseph Mills
Defendant:
Bank OZK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Burdogz LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Burdogz LLC d/b/a Burdogz and d/b/a Burdogz Bar and Grill, Jennifer K. Moya and Russell C. Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortega v. JKB FINANCIAL
as 5:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
JKB FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. DiTommaso Inc.
as 5:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
DiTommaso Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kiarie v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kiarie
Defendant:
Mialin Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blackwells Capital LLC v. Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Blackwells Capital LLC
Defendant:
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc., Montgomery Bennett, Richard J. Stockton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
