Cases 31 - 40 of 10,792
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ritchie v. Gunden
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Julie Ritchie
Defendant:
Roger Gunden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Conway v. Roberts et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Administrator Nicole Conway and Nicole Conway
Defendant:
Steve Roberts, Jr., City of Williamsburg and The City of Wiliamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gilder et al v. Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Rufus Gilder and Sonia Gilder
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC, Brian W. Lown, Esquire, Charisse M. Mullen, Esquire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hodges v. Cevallos
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Gabrielle Camille Cevallos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
