Cases 31 - 40 of 24,828
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Williams v. Leopold et al
as 6:2024cv01772
Plaintiff:
Derek Mario Williams
Defendant:
Brayden Leopold, Harry McConnell and Jacob Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Burleson v. Nettles
as 8:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Darriel A Burleson
Defendant:
Bill Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. Kimbler
as 6:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Michael Kimbler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rue v. USA
as 4:2024cv01812
Petitioner:
Charles Antonio Rue
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Breyan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv01763
Plaintiff:
Michael A Breyan
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Corrections Division of Police, McCormick and Roy E Cox, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Lucas v. Master Trooper Leon Porter et al
as 5:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Dasia Lucas, Chukeya Williams, Tamika Thomas and others
Defendant:
Master Trooper Leon Porter and South Carolina Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dukes v. Addison et al
as 4:2024cv01771
Plaintiff:
Henry J. Dukes and Henry Jermaine Dukes
Defendant:
Sean Addison and Conway Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dunagan v. Ray et al
as 1:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Sean Richard Dunagan
Defendant:
Director Patricia Ray, Major Shanae Lumpkin, SGT. Tamieka Gregg-Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
