Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 100
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARRELL
as 2:2012cv02394
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUDSON JONDHI HARRELL
Cause Of Action: Recovery of Debt to US
YEUNG v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2008cv05318
Plaintiff: KWAN H. YEUNG
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
as 2:2010cv02618
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
Movant: ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC.
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
GAMACHE v. THE STATE OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv01906
Defendant: THE STATE OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff: GREGORY GAMACHE
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE (1) GLOCK, MODEL 23GEN4, .40 CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER BCDZ585 et al
as 2:2018cv01019
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ONE (1) GLOCK, MODEL 23GEN4, .40 CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER BCDZ585, ONE (1) BERETTA, MODEL 92FS, 9MM PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER A107169Z
GAMACHE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv01907
Plaintiff: GREGORY GAMACHE
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NINETEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ($19,900.00)
as 2:2016cv05603
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NINETEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ($19,900.00)
Claimant: LOUIS L. SIROLLI
Cause Of Action: (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?